I agree with you, but I'm thinking more of the sort of things that don't contribute to personality, like when a person associates their tulpa speaking with the top right of their head or something of that sort.(edited)
for some it might be that top-right head association, for others it may be something else, for others it may be a combination of factors, and so on and so forth, are my thoughts.(edited)
2:46 AM
and I think tulpamancy is an advanced application of that
That is why I do think tulpas are context personalities. I simply decide that the context is being "Harleen" or "Angel", so to speak, directly, I must decide this, speak, decide to be the other, speak and so on.
Have you considered trying to build up some sort of "subconscious choice" and seeing if you could get the changing back and forth to happen without your decision, or is that a control of something you'd rather not give up?
That's fair. I had been putting a lot of weight in tulpamancy behind the idea that it was rooted in the fact that it had a lot of "subconscious" and 'unconscious' things going on that made the experience as something beyond the control of the person experiencing it.
3:12 AM
It's super abnormal to see someone doing away with that part, which makes me want to rethink a little bit.
Like, a person makes a tulpa with the explicit goal of making identities that "happen without effort". You seem to have thrown away the "without effort" parts and kept the "identities" part?
I suppose, I would be afraid to not have this control. Since I had a series of psychotic breaks, I do my best to stay grounded in reality, thinking on it, for a minute.